Cowardice Is Not a Virtue --Larken Rose

Anything and Everything dealing with Political issues.
Post Reply
User avatar
sleepyhead
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 534
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:26 pm
Location: Pinellas County

Cowardice Is Not a Virtue --Larken Rose

Post by sleepyhead » Fri Oct 13, 2017 5:50 pm

Great article from Larken Rose about the hypocrisy of gun control advocates.
https://steemit.com/anarchy/@larkenrose ... t-a-virtue

Cowardice Is Not a Virtue

Those clamoring for “gun control,” particularly right after some spectacular and dramatic shooting, seem to think they are demonstrating how compassionate, enlightened, civilized and responsible they are. In reality, they are doing something which is both foolish and cowardly. Then again, most vocal proponents of “gun control” seem to care more about how they look to others, than they do about actually doing anything useful. (Of course, that is true of almost anyone who loudly and conspicuously advocates a “government” solution to anything.)

First and foremost, pushing a “legislative” solution always amounts to condoning a violent solution. “Laws” are not polite suggestions; they are threats of force. “Gun control,” while usually framed in vague, euphemistic terms by its proponents, is gun violence. It is politicians threatening to send men with guns after any mere peasant who possesses something that the masters say they are not allowed to possess.

So, for example, anyone who condones the outlawing of semi-auto military style rifles is, from his place of irresponsible cowardice, condoning violence against me personally (I own an AR-15), based on his own ignorance and/or desire to appear compassionate.

But “gun control” advocates are not just ignorant and cowardly; they are also massively hypocritical. I have yet to meet any “gun control” proponent who wants any weapons taken away from agents of the state. Indeed, they very much want “government” enforcers to be heavily armed with all sorts of weapons of war, and then hope they come running when some mere peasant goes berserk.

All of those conspicuously “caring” Hollywood doofuses, for example, calling for “gun control” in the wake of some shooting or other, are essentially conveying this message: “If something really bad is happening, I have no intention of trying to stop it myself, I don’t even want the ability to stop it, and I don’t trust anyone else to have the desire or machinery to stop it, except for agents of the ruling class.”

They are projecting their own irresponsibility and immaturity onto everyone else, assuming that because all they would do in a crisis is hide in a corner and wait for “the authorities” to save their sorry asses (good luck with that), they think that everyone else should be forced to do likewise. They are scared little children who could never imagine taking it upon themselves to stop evil from happening, so all they can think to do is whine to their political masters to please try to make all the other “children” helpless too. And they think that counts as them doing something.

What makes it worse is that they wear their pathetic helplessness (mental and physical) with such pride, as if it is a badge of honor. The pretend to be anti-violence, while condoning massive state violence all over the place, including against all those people who do take it upon themselves to be unpaid defenders of everyone around them.

One of the strangest things to watch is an advocate of victim disarmament (“gun control”) trying to talk down to those of us who take on the extremely serious responsibility of having the means and willingness to use deadly force if some psycho (public or private) decides to go crazy.

“No one needs weapons like this!!”

Every time I hear a “gun control” advocate say something like that, I know he is lying, to himself and everyone else. What he actually means is, “We pathetic little peasants should never be allowed to possess such things, but the political masters and their underlings (who started out as peasants) should definitely have weapons like that, and so much more!”

“Gun control” proponents are in no way anti-gun; They are not at all advocating doing away with the weapons entirely; they are condoning instead a violently enforced monopoly on owning such weapons, by the very gang which is responsible for more theft and murder than any other entity in history (namely, “government”). And they are specifically clamoring to have agents of the state use their guns to forcibly disarm others who haven’t threatened or harmed anyone.

And that’s both immoral and stupid. It would be more understandable (albeit still naive and misguided) if they wished for some magic button to make all guns disappear, but instead they are proudly cheering to have the most heavily armed gang in the world (the United States “government”) disarming everyone else. In short, they are thinking and acting like stupid, helpless children who are trying to look compassionate.

If you actually want to protect the innocent and reduce violent aggression, there are two things you should do: 1) Stop advocating the biggest example of violent aggression in the world (“government”) and become a voluntaryist, and; 2) Get a freaking gun, learn how to use it, and become one of the people able and willing to actually resist and combat the sociopaths and thugs of the world.

If you’re too philosophically or physically cowardly to do either, then just quietly hide somewhere and hope that someone with more courage than you, and more weapons than you, saves your sorry ass. But stop projecting your irresponsibility onto everyone else by begging the ruling class to make everyone else as helpless and pathetic as you.

User avatar
jjk308
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 5314
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:08 pm
Location: Oldsmar, Florida USA

Re: Cowardice Is Not a Virtue --Larken Rose

Post by jjk308 » Sat Oct 14, 2017 7:17 am

Cut to the chase:

Either they believe in gun control because they are ignorant or misinformed of the miserable results or,

They are advocating it just so they can feel better about themselves,

or both.

[smilie=014.gif]
I swear by Jupiter Optimus Maximus .... in the army of the consul Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus and for 10 miles around it I will not steal anything worth more than a sestertius in any one day.

User avatar
sleepyhead
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 534
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 4:26 pm
Location: Pinellas County

Re: Cowardice Is Not a Virtue --Larken Rose

Post by sleepyhead » Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:59 am

Actually, the point that he is making is that gun control itself is a paradoxical concept. If you are against "gun violence" and support gun control, then you are also supporting "gun violence" because gun control laws are enforced the same way every other law is enforced: with violence and guns.

Of course, most boot-lickers are generally OK with this contradiction. As long we restrict guns to only agents of the state, they are perfectly fine with gun violence.

User avatar
jjk308
Life Member
Life Member
Posts: 5314
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:08 pm
Location: Oldsmar, Florida USA

Re: Cowardice Is Not a Virtue --Larken Rose

Post by jjk308 » Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:38 am

They are pretty good about whining about that condition when the violence is directed at a favored ethnic group.

As I said the real reasons are ignorance and a selfish desire to feel good, to believe that they are "making a difference", regardless of the consequences.
You can write a million words on the gun control problem but that is what it boils down to. The facts are that for American whites the murder rate, from all causes, is about the same as in the highly gun controlled European Union.
In an ethnic group with only about 40% of the gun ownership of whites, African Americans, it is 8.7 times higher according to the FBI. And this ethnic divide has gotten worse over the last 40 years of gun control. When I looked at it about 30 years ago it was only 6X the white rate!
I swear by Jupiter Optimus Maximus .... in the army of the consul Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus and for 10 miles around it I will not steal anything worth more than a sestertius in any one day.

Post Reply